|
Introduction
High-power semiconductor lasers are the most efficient man-made light sources and convert up to three-quarters of electric energy into
light. Such operation, however, is connected with very high internal power densities of more than 1010 W/cm3,
strong local heating, and
sometimes even device degradation. Catastrophic optical damage (COD) of the mirrors of diode lasers is a relevant degradation mechanism
and major limit for reaching ultra-high optical powers. So far, the detailed evolution of COD in space and time is not understood,
making the effect unpredictable. We give an overview on research activities targeting the mechanisms being involved in the COD process,
which turns out to be essentially a thermal effect. In particular the sequence of events and the fast kinetics taking place on a
nanosecond to microsecond time scale are addressed. Paving the way for knowledge-based solutions towards more robust diode lasers
represents the ultimate goal of this work. Figure 1 shows a typical laser structure and the way, how COD affects such diode lasers.

Figure1 Schematic of a high-power diode laser (left) and typical architecture of the
epitaxial layer system (right). (b) Micrograph of an 808 nm emitting high-power diode laser. The device is packaged onto a submount
(bluish). Four wires in center provide the n-current supply. The front facet with the dimensions 400 µm in width and 100 µm in height
appears black. Micrographs of the about 1 µm thick optical active region representing a small part of the front facet before (c) and
after COD (d). Spatial distribution of the laser emission (nearfield) at an operation current of 0.5 A from the same device before (e)
and after COD (f).
The basic idea of our current work is to monitor COD processes online during single current pulses (500 ns-2 µs) and thus to
resolve them temporally. For this purpose we constructed a special setup that allows for simultaneous monitoring of the emission
power (with 1 ns temporal resolution) and inspection of the front facet with a thermocamera, see Fig. 2. The latter allows detecting
COD events by the ‘thermal flash’, i.e. an impulsive release of Planck’s radiation during the thermal runaway.
Figure 2 Schematic of the experimental setup.
Limits of semiconductor laser operation in 808 nm emitting broad-area devices
Figure 3 shows current and spatially averaged power transients (left panel) obtained in single-pulse-experiments while the right panel
gives temporally averaged thermal images. The presence or absence of the thermal runaway is unambiguously detected by the thermocamera.
Furthermore, this data demonstrates the compression of the 'time to COD' to a few tens of nanoseconds for sufficiently high operation
currents. Such data are compiled in Figure 4 (a). Threshold power for reaching the COD (PCOD) are plotted as full circles in case a
thermal flash was observed. Open circles represent experiments where no COD and no thermal flash was detected. For this case,
the ordinate gives the pulse length. Obviously, there is a borderline dividing the diagram (and hence the operation regimes) into
two regions: one with and one without COD. The blurred region in-between is explained by the scattering of individual device
properties within the sample set. The dashed line shows the 'square-root law', known from earlier literature. Thus, compliance with
the data obtained in pulsed operation with multiple pulses is demonstrated. Such a diagram defines regimes in which COD is avoided by
the proper choice of operation parameters for a particular batch of devices. It is important to note that the 'time to COD' scale is
determined by the accumulation time of excess energy which is absorbed from the optical output and results eventually in a local
melting of the device. This has been proven by making-up the energy balance within the tiny heated front facet volume; see Fig. 4 (c).
The experimental value Wexp as derived from data sets such as given in Fig. 3 is compared with the energy required to reach the
melting temperature of the active region material.

Figure 3 Current and emission power transients from 4 devices: diode laser current (black lines) and
optical output power (red lines) as a function of time. The onset of COD (at time tCOD) is marked by arrows. The right panel shows the
corresponding thermo-images recorded during the current pulse. Estimated maximal temperatures of the thermal flashes are included.

Figure 4 (a) COD diagram showing the regions of COD (filled circles) and no COD
(open circles) occurrence. The occurrence of COD was derived from an analysis of thermo-images such as displayed in Fig. 3 (right panel).
The borderline (colored gray) is blurred because of the randomness in filamentation and scatter in device properties.
(b) Absorbed output energy Wexp calculated from the experimental transients versus damaged area on the front facet (symbols).
The solid line is to guide the eye.
(c) Absorbed output energy Wexp as a function of the calculated thermal energy Wtheo required to heat the damaged device volume
to the melting point (symbols). The dashed line represents the 'square-root law' that has been originally discovered for devices
with smaller emission powers.
The time resolved experiments presented here demonstrate nanosecond time intervals to COD. This time scale is determined by
the accumulation time of excess energy which is absorbed from the optical output and results eventually in a local melting of
the device. Our work identifies a regime in which COD of high-power semiconductor lasers is avoided by the proper choice of
operation parameters, allowing the ultimate limit of semiconductor laser operation to be reached. Such results potentially serve
as a benchmark for future modeling of fast COD dynamics.
Time-resolved analysis of catastrophic optical damage in 975 nm emitting diode lasers
Monitoring a COD diagram, as described in the preceding section, requires a homogeneous set of devices which eventually
gets destroyed. We developed an alternative approach based on a less complex step test with single, subsequently increasing current
pulses. Before increasing the current by a further step, an additional test measurement with a regular operation current is made.
This method was demonstrated with 975 nm emitting broad area lasers. Figure 5 shows selected current and emission power transients
and the corresponding thermal images, while Fig. 6 summarizes the results from 4 devices. Fig. 6 (a) shows the power evolution
in test pulses and Fig. 6 (b) quantifies the thermal flashes. There is a clear correlation between device degradation (power drop
in the test pulse) and the first appearance of a ‘thermal flash’. Most striking, however, is the finding of multiple thermal flashes
giving direct evidence of the presence of multiple thermal runaway processes in subsequent pulses. Figure 6 (c) shows even a lateral
motion of the flash across about half of the emitter stripe width. A further important finding is illustrated by Fig. 5: the onset
of the thermal runaway process at 32 A is seen as (weak) thermal flash but not as distinct power drop, as observed for shorter wave
length devices; see Fig. 3. The time constant of power loss for the 975 nm emitting devices was determined to 400-2000 ns, while for
the 808 nm emitting devices 30-400 ns have been observed. This is in agreement with the empirically known higher robustness of longer
wavelength devices against COD.

Figure 5 Data from a step-test en route to COD: current pulse (black line,
left ordinate) and
emission power (red line, right ordinate) and thermal image (inset, in counts). The dashed line in (a)
represents a linear fit of the power drop, while in (b) and (c) the same type of line represents the expected power drop
as extrapolated from the transients taken from 2 to 32 A.
Figure 6 Evolution of the optical output during a current pulse of 1.86 A
(as a measure of device
degradation) after application of single current pulses with the amplitude given on the abscissa. (b) Thermal flash magnitude
(intensity) as detected by the thermocamera. (c) Thermal images from device A taken during subsequent pulses with amplitudes
from 24 to 35 A (from top to bottom, in counts). The emitter stripe width of 100 µm is indicated.
The proposed test method shows how to artificially slow down the explosion-like COD process. The COD single-pulse step test
bears the potential to become a standard COD test, because it reduces at the same time the expenses and effects related to
thermal load and gradual aging.
Summary and Outlook
COD represents an important sudden degradation mechanism and major limit preventing diode lasers to reach ultra-high powers.
COD is dominated by thermal mechanisms. This time flow can be separated into three phases:
- In the 1st phase the facet temperature is approaching a critical temperature Tcrit. Depending on the surface status
of the facet and on operation conditions this phase takes from years (continuous wave operation) down to a few tens
of nanoseconds (short high current pulses).
- The 2nd phase involves the thermal runaway. Strongly localized melting takes place and the 'hot spot' spread
spatially. Model calculations predict typical rise times on the order of one ns. So far, this phase has never been
experimentally resolved, but our energy balances (see Fig. 3) point to this timescale as well.
- The 3rd phase of COD begins when the thermal runaway stops because of a lack of energy provided by the
laser emission. Further degradation takes place, in particular if the operation current is not abruptly terminated.
This represents the standard case. This phase involves the creation of collateral damage that is not necessarily directly
related to the thermal runaway. The duration of this phase depends much on operation conditions and might last up to minutes.
Typical values are rather in the µs-ms range (if the operation current remains on).
The particular feature of a mechanism like the thermal runaway is that a point-like microscopic source like a single optical
filament with a temperature in excess of Tcrit is sufficient to make the entire macroscopic device collapsing.
For future work it will be important to temporally resolve COD further and to separate between the different heat contributions
involved into the process. Here, single pulse measurements are very promising for the following reasons:
- The ratio between bulk and facet heating can be adjusted.
- Single-pulse operation helps for separating the role of the actual chip architecture from that of the thermal properties
of the package.
- It allows for the intentional preparation of pre-stages and very early phases of the COD process. Devices intentionally
degraded in such a way are interesting for further (destructive) analysis.
- COD can be analyzed even for diode lasers that fail under regular operation conditions by other mechanisms than COD.
- The single-pulse approach could help for establishing standard COD-test procedures.
Experimental challenges consist in the time resolved observation of the thermal runaway and the determination of the temporal
temperature profile during the entire COD process. This involves also the temperature within the third phase. Advanced temperature
measurements are expected to rely on the detection of Planck’s radiation. Theory and modeling are required in order to explain the
different COD kinetics observed for devices made of different material systems or operated under different conditions. Eventually, such
work should lead to knowledge-based solutions that increase the optical strength of diode lasers against COD by design.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following scientist for helpful discussion: Ute Zeimer, Bernd Sumpf, and
Götz Erbert of the Ferdinand Braun Institute Berlin, Stella Elliott and Peter Smowton, of the University of Cardiff,
Wlodzimierz Nakwaski of the Technical University of Lódz, Martina Baeumler, of the Fraunhofer Institute for
Applied Solid-State Physics Freiburg, Henning E. Larsen, Peter E. Andersen, and Paul M. Petersen of the Danish Technical University,
Jose Manuel G. Tijero and Ignacio Esquivias of the Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Michel Krakowski and Nicolas Michel of
Alcatel-Thales III-V lab Palaiseau, Julien Nagle of Thales Research and Technology Palaiseau, Peter Brick, Martin Reufer,
Martin Müller, Harald König, and Uwe Strauss of Osram Opto Semiconductors Regensburg, and Marwan Bou Sanayeh of
Notre Dame University Louaize, Lebanon.
Funding by the European Commission within the project WWW.BRIGHTER.EU under Contract No. IST-2005-035266 is acknowledged.
|